The web edition of the California Law Review.

CLR Online

Online Comment, August 2016, Alexandra D. Jones California Law Review Online Comment, August 2016, Alexandra D. Jones California Law Review

The Conflict Between Social Media Discovery and User Privacy

In Forman v. Henkin, the First Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York clarified New York’s rules for social media discovery. The court held that if a party seeks to gain access to a private social media account as part of the discovery process, that party must first make a threshold showing of…

Read More
Online Comment, July 2016, Kristoffer James S. Jacob California Law Review Online Comment, July 2016, Kristoffer James S. Jacob California Law Review

The Constitutional Price for Affordable Housing

The California Supreme Court held, in the landmark case California Building Industry Association v. City of San Jose, that the City of San Jose’s inclusionary housing ordinance is a valid exercise of the City’s police power. In the context of legal precedent, the California Supreme Court decided the case correctly by applying a lenient standard…

Read More
Online Comment, May 2016, Cynthia Lee California Law Review Online Comment, May 2016, Cynthia Lee California Law Review

Subverting the Communications Decency Act

This Comment discusses J.S. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, arguing that the Washington Supreme Court erodes the safe harbor provision of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 in this decision. As affirmed by several circuits, the CDA exempts websites and other interactive computer services from liability over third-party content so long as they…

Read More
Online Comment, April 2016, Alexander S. Epstein California Law Review Online Comment, April 2016, Alexander S. Epstein California Law Review

More Money, No Problem

This Comment discusses the implications of McCutcheon v. FEC, arguing that Justice Roberts’s opinion, coupled with Citizens United v. FEC, eviscerates campaign finance laws. The plurality’s position drastically contravenes public policy, overlooks its own precedent, and erroneously ignores McCutcheon‘s inevitable effects.

Read More
Online Comment, September 2015, Lindsay Walter California Law Review Online Comment, September 2015, Lindsay Walter California Law Review

Judicial Limits in Addressing Homelessness

This comment examines the recent Ninth Circuit case, Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles. The Ninth Circuit seeks to establish a standard that prohibits discretionary enforcement of city municipal codes against homeless people, removing one tool that cities use to keep homeless people out of public spaces. However, the court does not provide cities…

Read More
Online Comment, August 2015, Taylor Altman California Law Review Online Comment, August 2015, Taylor Altman California Law Review

Integral and Indispensable?

In Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, the Supreme Court held that post-work security screenings were noncompensable under the FLSA because they were neither the primary activity that the employees were hired to perform nor “integral and indispensable” to that activity. Following a discussion of the Court’s decision, this Comment calls for a reconsideration of…

Read More
Online Comment, August 2015, Noah Drake California Law Review Online Comment, August 2015, Noah Drake California Law Review

Public Performance Rights for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings

Historically, radio broadcasters have never paid royalties to rightsholders in sound recordings made before 1972 because it was assumed that there were no public performance rights for such recordings. This was challenged recently when former Turtles members, Flo & Eddie, brought suit in California against Sirius XM, successfully arguing that state law confers a public…

Read More
Online Comment, May 2015, Caroline Mala Corbin California Law Review Online Comment, May 2015, Caroline Mala Corbin California Law Review

Commentary: Exploiting Mixed Speech

The Supreme Court has been taking advantage of mixed speech “speech that is both private and governmental” to characterize challenged speech in the way that permits the government to sponsor Christian speech. In Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, a free speech case where the government accepted a Christian Ten Commandments monument but rejected a Summum Seven Aphorisms…

Read More
Online Comment, April 2015, Dennise Martinez California Law Review Online Comment, April 2015, Dennise Martinez California Law Review

Redefining the Standard in Loss Causation Arguments

The Ninth Circuit recently ruled that a company announcement of an internal investigation is insufficient to establish a loss causation theory in a securities fraud action under section 10(b) of the Exchange Act. Specifically, it stated that an announcement of an investigation is not a corrective disclosure“”an event that discloses a company’s fraud. This Comment…

Read More
Online Comment, November 2014, Josh Gupta-Kagan California Law Review Online Comment, November 2014, Josh Gupta-Kagan California Law Review

<em>In re Sanders</em> and the Resurrection of <em>Stanley v. Illinois</em>

In 1972, the Supreme Court in Stanley v. Illinois declared that parents are entitled to a hearing on their fitness before the state places their children in foster care, but for decades family courts would not apply this precedent to non-offending parents in child protection cases. Without even citing Stanley, courts held that finding…

Read More
Online Comment, September 2014, Michael Kagan California Law Review Online Comment, September 2014, Michael Kagan California Law Review

The Limits of Academic Freedom

Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision on race in university admissions, attracted considerable attention due to the sharp disagreement about race consciousness between Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sonia Sotomayor. But behind the evident division on the Court about the race, a close reading of Schuette indicates…

Read More