More Money, No Problem

This Comment discusses the implications of McCutcheon v. FEC, arguing that Justice Roberts’s opinion, coupled with Citizens United v. FEC, eviscerates campaign finance laws. The plurality’s position drastically contravenes public policy, overlooks its own precedent, and erroneously ignores McCutcheon’s inevitable effects.

Previous
Previous

Subverting the Communications Decency Act

Next
Next

The Intersection of Civil Rights and Social Movements