The web edition of the California Law Review.

CLR Online

Response, November 2018, Hillel Y. Levin, Michael L. Wells California Law Review Response, November 2018, Hillel Y. Levin, Michael L. Wells California Law Review

Qualified Immunity and Statutory Interpretation: A Response to William Baude

Professor William Baude asks, “Is qualified immunity unlawful?” He refers to the § 1983 defense, under which officers avoid liability for damages unless they have violated “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Baude concludes that qualified immunity is unlawful because…

Read More
Response, April 2017, Daniel Westreich, James Grimmelmann California Law Review Response, April 2017, Daniel Westreich, James Grimmelmann California Law Review

Incomprehensible Discrimination

The following (fictional) opinion of the (fictional) Zootopia Supreme Court of the (fictional) State of Zootopia is designed to highlight one particularly interesting issue raised by Solon Barocas and Andrew Selbst in Big Data’s Disparate Impact. Their article discusses many ways in which data-intensive algorithmic methods can go wrong when they are used to make employment and other sensitive…

Read More
Response, September 2014, Timothy M. Mulvaney California Law Review Response, September 2014, Timothy M. Mulvaney California Law Review

Progressive Property Moving Forward

In response to Ezra Rosser’s article, The Ambition and Transformative Potential of Progressive Property, 101 Calif. L. Rev. 107 (2013), Timothy Mulvaney expresses more confidence than does Rosser in property’s potential to serve a role in furthering a progressive society. If property is to serve in this role, however, Mulvaney suggests it is important…

Read More
Response, December 2013, Christian R. Burset California Law Review Response, December 2013, Christian R. Burset California Law Review

The Messy History of the Federal Eminent Domain Power: A Response to William Baude

In this response to William Baude’s article, “Rethinking the Federal Eminent Domain Power,” Christian Burset challenges Baude’s claim that antebellum legislators, commentators, and judges uniformly refused to acknowledge a federal eminent domain power. Examining historical sources and case law, Burset highlights how changing political attitudes influenced historic beliefs…

Read More
Response, October 2013, Melissa Murray California Law Review Response, October 2013, Melissa Murray California Law Review

Panopti-Moms

In her response to “Innocence Interrupted: Reconstructing Fatherhood in the Shadow of Child Molestation Law” (101 Calif. L. Rev. 609), Professor Melissa Murray compares contemporary criminal child molestation statutes to Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, the all-observing watchtower that normalizes expectations of constant state surveillance. Arguing that the enforcement of child-molestation laws creates…

Read More
Response, December 2011, Michael Boucai California Law Review Response, December 2011, Michael Boucai California Law Review

Sexual Epistemology and Bisexual Exclusion: A Response to Russell Robinson’s “Masculinity as Prison: Race, Sexual Identity, and Incarceration”

In an effort to curb sexual assault behind bars, the Los Angeles County Jail currently houses inmates deemed homosexual and transgender in a special unit called “K6G.” Professor Russell Robinson’s Article, “Masculinity as Prison: Race, Sexual Identity…

Read More
Response, January 2010, Robert Chesney California Law Review Response, January 2010, Robert Chesney California Law Review

The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole

For many years David Cole has been grappling, both in the courtroom and in the pages of the law reviews, with the difficult task of maximizing civil liberties while adequately addressing concerns related to terrorism and other national security threats. By and large, he has played the role of government critic in these debates, highlighting perceived abuses and drawing particular attention…

Read More