Articles, notes, and symposia pieces published in CLR’s print volumes.

Print Edition

Symposium, Volume 110, December 2022, Richard H. Pildes California Law Review Symposium, Volume 110, December 2022, Richard H. Pildes California Law Review

Democracies in the Age of Fragmentation

American democracy faces profound challenges in our era. Some of these challenges stem from features in the institutional design of democracy that are hard-wired into the Constitution; those challenges, unique to the United States, are the ones Steven Levitsky focused on in his provocative lecture. But other major challenges confronting American democracy are common to…

Read More
Symposium, Volume 110, December 2022, Richard Albert California Law Review Symposium, Volume 110, December 2022, Richard Albert California Law Review

The World’s Most Difficult Constitution to Amend?

America’s frozen constitution could well be the world’s most difficult to amend. Far from being a badge of honor, the distinction of topping the global charts on constitutional rigidity is cause for alarm. Ancient and virtually impervious to amendment, the United States Constitution has withstood all modern efforts to renovate its outdated architecture on elections…

Read More
Symposium, Volume 110, December 2022, Roberto Gargarella California Law Review Symposium, Volume 110, December 2022, Roberto Gargarella California Law Review

Restoring Democracy in a Multiracial Society

In this brief Essay, I present six comments to Steven Levitsky’s lecture. I suggest that the author (1) clarify some of the basic concepts he uses in his text, particularly the concept of democracy; (2) not confuse the problems of democracy with the problems of constitutionalism; (3) take more centrally into account the problem imposed on our democracies by the existence of profound…

Read More
Article, Podcast, Volume 110, October 2022, Elizabeth Ford California Law Review Article, Podcast, Volume 110, October 2022, Elizabeth Ford California Law Review

Wage Recovery Funds

Wage theft is rampant in the United States. It occurs so frequently because employers have much more power than workers. Worse, our main tool for preventing and remedying wage theft—charging government agencies with enforcing the law—has largely failed to mitigate this power differential…

Read More
Note, Volume 110, October 2022, Eli Freedman California Law Review Note, Volume 110, October 2022, Eli Freedman California Law Review

The Unstoppable App Campaign: The Dangers of First Amendment Protection for In-App Political Campaigning

Technology platforms give Silicon Valley an unprecedented ability to shape the political reality of consumers. In the 2020 California election, gig corporations like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Instacart won a major political battle ensuring that their workers remained independent contractors…

Read More
Article, Volume 110, October 2022, Laila L. Hlass California Law Review Article, Volume 110, October 2022, Laila L. Hlass California Law Review

Lawyering from a Deportation Abolition Ethic

This Article contributes to the emerging literature on abolition within the immigration legal system by mapping deportation abolition theory onto lawyering practice. Deportation abolitionists work to end immigrant detention, enforcement, and deportation, explicitly understanding immigrant justice as part of a larger racial justice fight…

Read More
Article, Volume 110, October 2022, Pauline T. Kim California Law Review Article, Volume 110, October 2022, Pauline T. Kim California Law Review

Race-Aware Algorithms: Fairness, Nondiscrimination and Affirmative Action

The growing use of predictive algorithms is increasing concerns that they may discriminate, but mitigating or removing bias requires designers to be aware of protected characteristics and take them into account. If they do so, however, will those efforts be considered a form of discrimination? Put concretely, if model-builders take race…

Read More
Article, Volume 110, October 2022, J.S. Welsh California Law Review Article, Volume 110, October 2022, J.S. Welsh California Law Review

Assimilation, Expansion, and Ambivalence: Strategic Fault Lines in the Pro-Trans Legal Movement

For the past five decades, lawyers advocating on behalf of trans people have used arguments based in a binary understanding of gender to win critical legal battles in the fight for gender justice. These binary arguments clearly serve a strategic purpose: achieving major legal victories. Judges from state trial courts to the U.S. Supreme Court…

Read More
Note, Podcast, Volume 110, August 2022, Elizabeth Heckmann California Law Review Note, Podcast, Volume 110, August 2022, Elizabeth Heckmann California Law Review

A Modern Poll Tax: Using the Twenty-Fourth Amendment to Challenge Legal Financial Obligations as a Condition to Re-Enfranchisement

The Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution has received little attention from federal courts since its ratification. The Amendment’s language is broad and far-ranging, prohibiting conditioning the right to vote on payment of poll taxes or “any other” tax. Although the Amendment’s text, its legislative history, and early Supreme Court decisions strongly indicate that […]

Read More

“Title Zero:” Ending the Infinite Loop of Classifications for Broadband via a Technology-Agnostic Definition

The opportunity to face one’s accuser is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. It is a historical right that the Romans afforded to Jesus’s disciples. And it is a right that may soon fall by the wayside in our new socially distant reality and beyond…

Read More
Article, Volume 110, August 2022, Sarah H. Lorr California Law Review Article, Volume 110, August 2022, Sarah H. Lorr California Law Review

Unaccommodated: How the ADA Fails Parents

In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to “provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities.” Thirty years after this landmark law, discrimination and ingrained prejudices against individuals with intellectual disabilities…

Read More

Reparative Justice in the U.S. Territories: Reckoning with America’s Colonial Climate Crisis

This Article links the climate crisis with the ongoing colonization of the U.S. territories. It explores how the U.S. territories’ political status—rooted in U.S. colonialism—limits their ability to develop meaningful adaptation efforts to combat the climate crisis in their islands. It offers a developing conceptual framework that draws upon…

Read More
Article, Volume 110, August 2022, Ari Ezra Waldman California Law Review Article, Volume 110, August 2022, Ari Ezra Waldman California Law Review

Privacy, Practice, and Performance

Privacy law is at a crossroads. In the last three years, U.S. policymakers have introduced more than fifty proposals for comprehensive privacy legislation, most of which look roughly the same: they all combine a series of individual rights with internal compliance. The conventional wisdom sees these proposals as groundbreaking…

Read More
Article, Volume 110, August 2022, Karen M. Tani California Law Review Article, Volume 110, August 2022, Karen M. Tani California Law Review

The <em>Pennhurst</em> Doctrines and the Lost Disability History of the “New Federalism”

This Article reconstructs the litigation over an infamous institution for people with disabilities—Pennhurst State School & Hospital—and demonstrates that litigation’s powerful and underappreciated significance for American life and law. It is a tale of two legacies. In U.S. disability history, Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital is a celebrated case. The 1977 trial court decision recognized a constitutional “right to habilitation” and ordered the complete closure of an overcrowded, dehumanizing facility.

Read More
Symposium, Volume 110, June 2022, Katerina Linos, Elena Chachko California Law Review Symposium, Volume 110, June 2022, Katerina Linos, Elena Chachko California Law Review

Refugee Responsibility Sharing or Responsibility Dumping?

A silver lining of recent migration crises is increased reliance on responsibility-sharing arrangements in international actor responses. This new experience allows for evidence-based analysis of such arrangements. We distinguish between progressive arrangements—ones that shift responsibilities to more affluent, institutionally…

Read More
Symposium, Volume 110, June 2022, E. Tendayi Achiume California Law Review Symposium, Volume 110, June 2022, E. Tendayi Achiume California Law Review

Empire, Borders, and Refugee Responsibility Sharing

International lawyers have been preoccupied with refugee responsibility sharing for decades, and with good reason. They have invested energy both in critiquing the existing regime and developing proposals for alternatives. However, the corresponding literature has largely, though not entirely, neglected two related but distinct phenomena: imperial domination and imperial intervention. I argue that attention to imperial domination and imperial intervention, which I define shortly, should unsettle the very frame of responsibility sharing and even asylum for many who are coerced into migration.

Read More
Note, Volume 110, June 2022, Maya Campbell California Law Review Note, Volume 110, June 2022, Maya Campbell California Law Review

“Perceived to be Deviant”: Social Norms, Social Change, and New York State’s “Walking While Trans” Ban

Section 240.37 of the New York State Penal Code, colloquially known as the “Walking While Trans” Ban, is an example of our nation’s commitment to its identity—defining the boundaries between what is deviant and non-deviant, what is normative and non-normative. This Note seeks to understand the intersection between…

Read More