The web edition of the California Law Review.

CLR Online

Online Article, December 2012, Dean Spade California Law Review Online Article, December 2012, Dean Spade California Law Review

The Only Way to End Racialized Gender Violence in Prisons is to End Prisons: A Response to Russell Robinson

In Masculinity As Prison: Sexual Identity, Race, and Incarceration, Professor Russell Robinson explores the creation of the KG6 unit of the Los Angeles County Jail. Robinson describes how this unit, designed to protect prisoners who may be targets because of non-normative gender and sexual orientation, operates as a site for the enforcement of racialized and classed norms about sexual…

Read More
Online Article, April 2012, Anne Tamar-Mattis California Law Review Online Article, April 2012, Anne Tamar-Mattis California Law Review

Sterilization and Minors with Intersex Conditions in California Law

California once led the country in sterilizations of mentally disabled people. In the first half of the twentieth century, this practice, inspired by the then-socially-acceptable “science” of eugenics, was considered progressive. Such sterilizations became common around the country and were authorized by state law in California and many other states…

Read More
Online Article, April 2012, Caren Myers Morrison California Law Review Online Article, April 2012, Caren Myers Morrison California Law Review

The Drug Dealer, the Narc, and the Very Tiny Constable: Reflections on <em>United States v. Jones</em>

On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court held unanimously that the installation and use of a GPS tracker on a suspected drug dealer’s Jeep constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment. The outcome had been fairly well foreshadowed: At oral argument, the Justices had seemed perturbed by the thought that police could put trackers on cars—even the Justices’s own cars—seemingly at will…

Read More

The Partisan Connection

We are sympathetic to the institutional innovations Leib and Elmendorf propose, and to the concept of democracy at the heart of their recommendations. They resist the opposition of “popular democracy” and “party democracy,” and their models of reform ingeniously blend the two. Popular democracy tries to make real the injunction that “the people should rule” by engaging “the people”…

Read More
Online Article, October 2010, Christina Wells California Law Review Online Article, October 2010, Christina Wells California Law Review

Regulating Offensiveness: <em>Snyder v. Phelps</em>, Emotion, and the First Amendment

Since 2005, the Reverend Fred Phelps and other members of the Westboro Baptist Church have outraged almost everyone by protesting near military funerals. In Snyder v. Phelps, the Supreme Court will finally decide whether that outrage is actionable. Few people will lose sleep if the Court finds that the First Amendment allows Albert Snyder to sue the Phelpses for intentional infliction…

Read More
Online Article, September 2010, Amy Widman California Law Review Online Article, September 2010, Amy Widman California Law Review

Liability and the Health Care Bill: An “Alternative” Perspective

The recently passed health care bill1 contains many provisions that deserve celebration. Improving access to care is an important first step. Enhancing patient safety and accountability is an important second step, one that proponents of medical malpractice reform often undermine with attempts to restrict the liability of health care providers through “litigation alternatives.” During the health care…

Read More
Online Article, May 2010, Joseph Lavitt California Law Review Online Article, May 2010, Joseph Lavitt California Law Review

Professionalism and Power: Flawed Decision Making by the OLC Exposes a Bar That is Losing Its Moxie

In recent years, legal scholars and practitioners alike have expressed major misgivings about the advice that the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) provided to former President George W. Bush following the attacks of September 11, 2001. On February 19, 2010, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. released internal communications of the Justice…

Read More
Online Article, February 2010, Bonnie Hough California Law Review Online Article, February 2010, Bonnie Hough California Law Review

Self-Represented Litigants in Family Law: The Response of California’s Courts

Approximately 200,000 divorce petitions are filed annually in California. Seventy percent of those cases involve at least one self-represented litigant at the beginning of the case. That figure increases to 80 percent by the time of judgment. This is not simply a California issue. Utah, for example, reports that 49 percent of petitioners and 81 percent of respondents in divorce…

Read More
Online Article, January 2010, Laurie Zelon California Law Review Online Article, January 2010, Laurie Zelon California Law Review

The Elkins Task Force: Meeting the Challenges of Family Law in California’s Courts

In 2007, the California Supreme Court faced a difficult question: were procedures used in a family law court, intended to make the process easier for the litigants, in fact violating their rights to due process? Deciding that they were, the Court declared: "[t]hat a procedure is efficient and moves cases through the system is admirable, but even more important is for the courts to provide fair and…

Read More