Articles, notes, and symposia pieces published in CLR’s print volumes.

Print Edition

Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, December 2019, Rachel E. Barkow California Law Review Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, December 2019, Rachel E. Barkow California Law Review

Three Lessons for Criminal Law Reformers

James Forman, Jr.’s Locking Up Our Own is that rare nonfiction work that is a page turner even when you know the ending. That is the product of exceptional writing, meticulous historical research, and the deep empathy of the author that gives the book its voice throughout. That is why it was both a worthy recipient the Pulitzer Prize and a feature on The Daily Show with Trevor Noah. It is as…

Read More
Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, December 2019, James Forman California Law Review Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, December 2019, James Forman California Law Review

Confronting Mass Incarceration: Lecture from the 2018–2019 Jorde Symposium

Thank you. It’s a real honor to be at any event that is sponsored by the Brennan Center. I read your tweets, your emails, your policy reports, and your articles in the Atlantic. You are a vital institution. Thank you for doing the work that you are doing. I had a chance to spend some time with Tom Jorde earlier this afternoon, and Tom, I want to tell you how much I appreciate you putting your name…

Read More
Essay, Volume 107, December 2019, Daniel Farbman California Law Review Essay, Volume 107, December 2019, Daniel Farbman California Law Review

Resistance Lawyering

This is the story of a group of abolitionist lawyers who devoted themselves to working within a legal system that they considered to be fundamentally unjust and illegitimate. These “resistance lawyers” used the limited and unfriendly procedural tools of the hated Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 to frustrate, oppose, and, if possible, dismantle the operation…

Read More
Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, June 2019, Stephen I. Vladeck California Law Review Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, June 2019, Stephen I. Vladeck California Law Review

Constitutional Remedies in Federalism’s Forgotten Shadow

“[F]ollowing our decision in Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), federal courts are generally no longer permitted to promulgate new federal common law causes of action . . . .” “When a party seeks to assert an implied cause of action under the Constitution itself . . . separation-of-powers principles are or should be central to the analysis. The…

Read More

Speaking with a Different Voice: Why the Military Trial of Civilians and the Enemy is Constitutional

The Constitution declares that the “Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus” can be suspended by the federal government only “in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion [when] the public Safety may require it.” Because some regard this Habeas Clause as the Constitution’s only “emergency” provision, the Clause looms large in treatments of the Constitution’s…

Read More
Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, June 2019, James E. Pfander California Law Review Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, June 2019, James E. Pfander California Law Review

Constructive Constitutional History and Habeas Corpus Today

In her book, Habeas Corpus in Wartime: From the Tower of London to Guantanamo Bay, Professor Amanda Tyler has written a definitive constitutional history of the habeas privilege in the United States. Rather than rehearsing the book’s many virtues, I propose to devote this short Essay to the familiar yet intractable problem of historical translation…

Read More
Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, June 2019, William A. Fletcher California Law Review Symposium, Essay, Volume 107, June 2019, William A. Fletcher California Law Review

Symposium Introduction

I am honored to write an introduction to the Symposium on Professor Amanda Tyler’s brilliant historical study, Habeas Corpus in Wartime: From the Tower of London to Guantanamo Bay. Professor Tyler has unearthed and examined the details of an important but only partially understood aspect of the British and American experience. She scrupulously traces the evolution of the writ of…

Read More
Symposium, Essay, Volume 106, December 2018, Richard Primus California Law Review Symposium, Essay, Volume 106, December 2018, Richard Primus California Law Review

Second Redemption, Third Reconstruction

In The Accumulation of Advantages, the picture that Professor Owen Fiss paints about equality during and since the Second Reconstruction is largely a picture in black and white. That makes some sense. The black/white experience is probably the most important throughline in the story of equal protection…

Read More
Symposium, Essay, Volume 106, December 2018, Justin Driver California Law Review Symposium, Essay, Volume 106, December 2018, Justin Driver California Law Review

The Keyes of Constitutional Law

Before beginning law school in 2001, I knew the names of an embarrassingly small number of judicial decisions. The only case names that I readily possessed were Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, Bush v. Gore, and a smattering of other opinions that had managed to escape the narrow confines of the legal community. I did, however, know the name of at least one relatively obscure opinion…

Read More
Essay, Volume 106, October 2018, Jennifer J. Lee California Law Review Essay, Volume 106, October 2018, Jennifer J. Lee California Law Review

Redefining the Legality of Undocumented Work

Undocumented workers face a new harsh reality under the Trump administration. Federal law’s prohibition of undocumented work has facilitated exploitation because workers fear being brought to the attention of immigration authorities. The current administration’s aggressive stance towards worksite enforcement will only exacerbate abuses against undocumented workers, such as wage theft…

Read More